<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Proper Setting Materials for Tile</title>
	<atom:link href="http://floorelf.com/proper-setting-materials-for-tile/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://floorelf.com/proper-setting-materials-for-tile</link>
	<description>Help with all your tile needs (and extreme jackassery!)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:37:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://floorelf.com/proper-setting-materials-for-tile/comment-page-3#comment-8018</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 02:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://floorelf.com/?p=94#comment-8018</guid>
		<description>Hey Scott,

Not really a good idea - the pan is not made for that and the bond long-term is untested. It may work, it may not, I honestly have no idea. Never had any reason to do that. I do not, and really can not, guarantee a failure - I can only give advice about methods that are guaranteed to succeed. That said, people do stuff all the time that is not an &#039;approved&#039; method and it works just fine. However, they also do many, many more which don&#039;t work out so well.

I&#039;m a lot of help, huh? :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Scott,</p>
<p>Not really a good idea &#8211; the pan is not made for that and the bond long-term is untested. It may work, it may not, I honestly have no idea. Never had any reason to do that. I do not, and really can not, guarantee a failure &#8211; I can only give advice about methods that are guaranteed to succeed. That said, people do stuff all the time that is not an &#8216;approved&#8217; method and it works just fine. However, they also do many, many more which don&#8217;t work out so well.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a lot of help, huh? <img src='http://floorelf.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://floorelf.com/proper-setting-materials-for-tile/comment-page-3#comment-8008</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 19:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://floorelf.com/?p=94#comment-8008</guid>
		<description>Hi Roger,
I have a polyurethane shower base that is securely sealed in a mortar bed, but is 1/8&quot; off on the level from the drain. Can I level off with epoxy, let it harden then lay down tile on top of that with epoxy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Roger,<br />
I have a polyurethane shower base that is securely sealed in a mortar bed, but is 1/8&#8243; off on the level from the drain. Can I level off with epoxy, let it harden then lay down tile on top of that with epoxy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://floorelf.com/proper-setting-materials-for-tile/comment-page-3#comment-7528</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 05:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://floorelf.com/?p=94#comment-7528</guid>
		<description>Hey Little Elf (if that is your real name :suspect: ),

That is a very, very significant height difference. The ones that sound hollow probably simply have less thinset beneath them. They aren&#039;t necessarily more prone to cracking (unless he had incomplete thinset coverage) but that is something you really can&#039;t predict without taking one or two up and seeing how the coverage is beneath it. Yes, it was a bad installation, the maximum allowable lippage depends on the individual tile but is rarely over 1/16&quot; height difference, even that is a lot, and NEVER more than 1/8&quot;. Attempting to level part of the floor that much lower normally requires a medium-bed mortar which doesn&#039;t shrink as much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Little Elf (if that is your real name <img src='http://floorelf.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_suspect.gif' alt=':suspect:' class='wp-smiley' />  ),</p>
<p>That is a very, very significant height difference. The ones that sound hollow probably simply have less thinset beneath them. They aren&#8217;t necessarily more prone to cracking (unless he had incomplete thinset coverage) but that is something you really can&#8217;t predict without taking one or two up and seeing how the coverage is beneath it. Yes, it was a bad installation, the maximum allowable lippage depends on the individual tile but is rarely over 1/16&#8243; height difference, even that is a lot, and NEVER more than 1/8&#8243;. Attempting to level part of the floor that much lower normally requires a medium-bed mortar which doesn&#8217;t shrink as much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

